14.2. Fourier Transform#
Contents: definition; properties; inverse transform; Plancherel’s theorem; uncertainty relation
14.2.1. Definition#
…
14.2.2. Properties#
Linearity
Time delay.
Derivative.
Integral.
Initial value.
Final value.
14.2.3. Inverse Fourier Transform#
Under the assumptions …todo, the inverse Fourier transform reads
Proof using Dirac’s delta expression.
Proof using dominated convergence theorem and Fubini’s lemma.
Proof. By the dominated convergence theorem, it follows that
Lemma 1. The Fourier transform of function \(\varphi(t):= e^{-\pi|t|^2}\) reads
having evaluated the integral \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-\alpha x^2}\) with \(\alpha = \pi\). todo justify the result for complex exponential. Use Bromwich contour integrals
Lemma 2. Fourier transform of \(f(\alpha t)\), \(\alpha > 0\)
Lemma 3. \(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} \varphi\left(\frac{t}{\varepsilon} \right) \rightarrow \delta(x)\) for \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\)
Fourier transform
Fubini’s theorem
\(\varphi_{\varepsilon}(t) = \frac{1}{\varepsilon^n} \varphi\left( \frac{t}{\varepsilon} \right)\), \(t \in \mathbb{R}^n\), is an approximation of Dirac’s delta for \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), so that
\[\begin{split}\begin{aligned} & \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} \int_{t = -\infty}^{+\infty} \varphi_{\varepsilon}(t- \tau) f(t) \, dt = f(\tau) \\ & \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0} \int_{t = -\infty}^{+\infty} \varphi_{\varepsilon}(t) \, dt = 1 \\ \end{aligned}\end{split}\]As the Fourier transform \(\mathscr{F}\left\{\varphi_{\varepsilon}(t)\right\}(\omega) \rightarrow 1\) for \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\), then \(\varphi_{\varepsilon}(t) \rightarrow \delta(t)\).
14.2.4. Plancherel’s theorem#
…assumptions…todo
and
Proof of Plancherel’s thm for the magnitude
having used (1) the approximation (11.3) of Dirac’s delta, and (2) property (11.2) of Dirac’s delta, and (3) the expression of the absolute value of complex functions \(g^*(t_1) g(t_1) = |g(t_1)|^2\).
Proof of Plancherel’s thm for the product of functions
having used (1) the approximation (11.3) of Dirac’s delta, and (2) property (11.2) of Dirac’s delta.
14.2.5. Uncertainty relation#
An uncertainty relation holds linking standard deviations of a probability density function in time domain and a probability density function built with its Fourier transform. From this very same relation, Heisenberg uncertainty relation between position and momentum in Quantum Mechanics seamlessly follows.
Given a function \(g(t)\) whose square of the absolute value is normalized to one, and thus it can be used as a probability density function in time domain,
for Plancherel’s theorem, the square of the magnitude of Fourier transform \(G(f)\) is unitary as well,
and thus it can be interpreted as a probability density function in frequency domain. The following uncertainty relation holds
or in terms of pulsation \(\omega = 2 \pi \, f\),
Heisenberg uncertainty relation in quantum mechanics
Space and momentum representation of the state function \(\Psi\) are related by the transformation,
as it’s shown in the section Quantum Mechanics:From position to momentum representation. The wave number reads \(k = \frac{p}{\hbar}\). Starting from the uncertainty relation between the space coordinate \(x\) and the wave number \(k\),
Heisenberg uncertainty principle for position and momentum (for the same Cartesian coordinates) reads
Proof of the uncertainty relation
Assuming zero average \(\overline{t} = 0\), \(\overline{f} = 0\) (see below for proof without this assumption)
having used in
(1)
and thus Plancherel’s theorem
in (2) Cauchy-Schwartz inequality,
(3)
and thus
If \(\overline{t} \ne 0\), or \(\overline{f} \ne 0\),